Last February during the Olympics, Cadillac carmakers aired
a commercial that generated considerable debate. The commercial features actor Neal McDonough
asking the question “Why do we [Americans] work so hard?” while he stands in
front of his pool and then walks into his beautiful home, complete with wife
and two kids, and finally to his driveway where he drives off in his $75,000
electric Cadillac. The narrative he
gives can be summarized as this: Americans are driven to work hard; it’s in
their DNA and that’s why we can live the lifestyle presented in this
commercial. (See the commercial here.)
I shared this commercial with some of my fellow adjuncts
before showing it to my American literature students. One of the adjuncts seemed upset that I
talked about the term “American Dream” in a derogatory sense. A few weeks later, out of the blue, this same
person asked me if I knew who Dr. Ben Carson is. I acknowledged my ignorance, and another
adjunct, who nodded in awareness of the narrative of Ben Carson’s life, quickly
brought the story up on her computer -- An
African-American born to a single mother who was illiterate, he grew up to
become a renowned neurosurgeon.[1] I can be a little slow at times in
understanding what’s going on around me, particularly when it requires me to
sort through people’s motives. It wasn’t
until I was driving home from work later that day that I realized my co-worker
was playing his trump card in response to my suggestion a few weeks before that
the idea of the American Dream is problematic.
My only response to him was, “Well, if there’s a down side to the Ben
Carson story, it’s that it is such an exception.” Why aren’t more African Americans able to
rise up from poverty, or why are so many African Americans in poverty to begin
with? The single success story is used
to deflect from the underlying social problems that keep most people from
realizing their potential.
So, back to the commercial that initiated all of this good
dialogue. It presents the myth of the
American Dream and in spite of Cadillac spokesman, Craig Bierley’s statement
defending the commercial by suggesting it wasn’t about the “stuff,” the content
of the commercial puts the “stuff” front and center. The American Dream is an idea that has
morphed over time since the term was first coined in 1931 by historian, James
Truslow Adams, but how does it operate in the American consciousness
today? Adams coined the term following
the stock market crash of 1929 while the country was in the throes of the Great
Depression. Linked to the Declaration of
Independence idea of “certain inalienable Rights” such as “Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness” the American Dream today seems much more focused on
the accumulation of wealth. It is
referenced by politicians of both parties to the degree of meaningless
rhetoric, which, in itself, should make us suspicious.
At a time when the wealth disparity in America is rivaling
the era of the robber barons of the last three decades of the nineteenth
century, the words “American Dream” are nostalgically uttered more frequently
in the media than I can remember in my lifetime. What are Americans pining for? A lost way of life? No, because the American Dream is just that—a
dream that a few select people have stumbled upon (some by hard work and chance
[like Ben Carson] but most through privilege and/or cunning) but it is not a
reality for the majority of Americans and especially those minorities who have
not had the benefit of privilege. Instead,
it operates as the carrot on a stick, keeping average working Americans
distracted from the harsh realities of corporate America. If only I work a little harder or save a
little more, everything will fall into place – this is the thinking that goads
us on while we never question the structures that are in place to keep this
status quo from changing.
This idealistic dream is useful to the systems of power,
whether governmental or corporate, but most often both and in league with one
another. Looking at the history of labor
and capital in America, it is clear that the government has worked in favor of
corporations the majority of the time.
When there have been legislative reforms in favor of labor, they have
been systematically eroded over time by the relentless forces of the moneyed. As wage labor became the norm with rapid
industrial advancements, employers increasingly treated workers as part of the
machinery of their industry. With
greater numbers of unskilled laborers, employer’s replacement costs decreased and
efficiency and maximum profit took precedence over worker conditions. Worker’s requests for humane conditions, like
the eight-hour work day, only came about with much effort and strikes on the
part of organized labor. It also came at
the cost of human lives, as government in league with corporations attempted to
halt such activities with military might.
Government, increasingly influenced by corporate interests,
turned its back on addressing real issues in favor of demanding party loyalty
through spectacle and militaristic fervor at the turn of the twentieth century. The
entrenchment of the two-party system of politics ensured a divisive battlefield
that enabled each party to focus mainly on branding rather than substance. They were learning from their corporate
counterpart.
Large corporate interests make it possible for politicians
to get re-elected without necessarily addressing the issues that concern their
constituents. Through several Supreme
Court rulings over the last fifty years culminating with the ruling on Citizens United vs. The Federal Election
Commission, the Supreme Court has determined that corporations are people
and that spending money is equivalent to free speech, which, if carried out
over time, will result in a plutocracy rather than a republic.
So, it’s no wonder politicians and corporations reference
this term -- The American Dream -- that has mythic power in the American
consciousness. It has the effect of
keeping average Americans focused mainly on work and individual achievement and
not on how our lives are interconnected or the importance of looking out for
one another. The infrequent “success
story” is the promise that everyone can achieve if they just take that second
or third job, while big-money corporations hi-jack what is supposed to be our
democratic system of government.
[1] It
wasn’t until I got home and did my own research that I became aware of all the
political and religious associations connected with the Ben Carson story, all
of which my co-worker neglected to include.
The decline in home ownership rates and a growing income inequality are just some of the signs that the American Dream of prosperity for many is in serious jeopardy. Our politicians have abandoned their responsibility to represent the interests of their constituents in favor of big money and self interest. We need to vote many incumbents out and put them on the same systems as us - Social Security, Affordable Care Act and the like. No more separate systems!
ReplyDeleteAnother phrase that generally comes up that is worth examining is 'the pursuit of happiness'. It has been used to defend similar sentiments about our rights as citizens towards monetary prosperity whatever the cost because somehow that is the only noble goal that supposedly inevitably leads to progress for all (see trickle down).
ReplyDeleteIn fact this phrase is conjured up to defend the rights of those who wish to go from rags to riches through the traditional route rather than through 'hand-outs'. It all reeks of claiming that we are all equally privileged and free to be successful and that what holds people back is weakness and government regulation. It is George Bush and his fellow Republicans that lay claim on the definition of happiness as laid out in the book 'the Antidote' but also what happened the the collective form of happiness that is sometimes referred to as 'well-being'?
When it comes to talking about the American Dream it's really interesting that many immigrants, my parents included, live a quintessential version of it without much irony and yet they are aware that our generation faces such great challenges that I don't have the same expectation to be able to be as successful as they have been, which I think is for the better not for the worst because what is an identity based on striving to perpetually want and have more material wealth and slowly replacing 'well-being' with happiness.
In response to Gary's comment I think that home ownership rates have been described as a mistake in the first place as being related to the American Dream as it helped creditors to make disastrous loans to people who they knew may not be able to pay them off, but since Democrats, I believe it was Clinton, brought in the idea of home ownership plus 2.5 kids and a dog into the picture of a 'normal' expectation for the average American and it is just now that in our culture people are reversing the judgment towards multiple generations that share the same roof, and that people are renting because home ownership isn't just the same kind of investment that it used to be but it's not necessarily an option economically for everyone. A really interesting piece was made about this that I think you would find interesting is an unusual documentary called 'All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace' that goes into corporations faking profits helped by major accounting firms and it's relationship to Alan Greenspan. It also is mostly about the way that particular individuals saw technology as a utopian effort towards a free market that required an American Dream kind of ideology to make it happen.
https://vimeo.com/38724174
Oops I just realized that "what is an identity based on striving to perpetually want and have more material wealth and slowly replacing 'well-being' with happiness." comes off as describing what my parents do, which is not what I meant to say, but what I forgot to state is that if I was expected to do as well as them, it would be to want each subsequent generation to better and better off or to maintaining and hoarding prosperity in order to maintain a legacy of wealth that was in the form of a previous generation.
ReplyDeleteReply to both Gary and Cedric:
ReplyDeleteI like the distinction you make, Cedric, between happiness and well-being. Does this idea that well-being refers to a collective kind of happiness that does not necessarily depend on material wealth come from another place? I'd be interested in reading about it if it does. The distinction you make seems to suggest a more relational sense of happiness rather than the individualistic pursuit of wealth. The former seems to be entirely left out of the American Dream ideal. I think Ford attempted to get at this in the commercial that they came out with as a parody of the Cadillac commercial (even though they denied that it was a parody of it).[See that commercial here: http://gawker.com/ford-parodies-totally-pwns-cadillacs-latest-rich-assh-1555097971]
But what is wrong even with Ford’s version is that they still are clinging to the idea that everyone needs their own car. It’s still an individualistic pursuit, even though the woman, Pashon Murray, does work that is very community-oriented. However, I still have to give Ford kudos for identifying the glaring hedonistic attitude of the Cadillac commercial and highlighting a real person whose work isn't all about the stuff.
And yes, you make another good point about how the whole American Dream ideal was manipulated by banks to exploit Americans. The dominant model of most corporations is based on a “bottom line” mentality that disregards every other consideration such as employee “well-being.” There are some corporations that are turning to an employee-owned model, which is an encouraging trend, but we have a long way to go.
The American Dream has hurt Americans by making us unquestioningly adhere to a set of ideals that plays directly into the marketing of corporations. The younger generations have the task of breaking free from many of these expected norms that have held us in this status quo because I think many from my generation are unwilling or unable to question it.